PA 

347 

C6 

1910 

MAIN 


UC-NRLF 


B    M    DEfl    flflT 


LIBRARY 

OF  THE 

University  of  California. 

RECEIVED    BY   EXCHANGE 

Class          '  \T 

^ 

USE  OF  THE  PERFECT  TENSE 

IN 

THE  ATTIC  ORATORS 


BY 

FRANK  LEVIS  CLOUD,  A.  M. 


THESIS 

PRESENTED  TO  THE  FACULTY  OF  THE  DEPARTMENT  OF 

PHILOSOPHY  OF  THE  UNIVERSITY  OF  PENNSYLVANIA, 

IN  PARTL\L  FULFILLMENT  OF  THE  REQUIREMENTS 

FOR  THE  DEGREE  OF  DOCTOR  OF  PHILOSOPHY. 


PRESS  or 

THE    HERALD    PUBLISHINQ    CO. 

NORRI8TOWN.    PA. 

ItlO 


USE  OF  THE  PERFECT  TENSE 

IN 

THE  ATTIC  ORATORS 


BY 

FRANK  LEVIS  CLOUD,  A.  M. 


THESIS 

PRESENTED  TO  THE   FACULTY  OF  THE  DEPARTMENT   OF 

PHILOSOPHY  OF  THE   UNIVERSITY   OF  PENNSYLVANIA, 

IN  PARTIAL  FULFILLMENT  OF  THE  REQUIREMENTS 

FOR  THE  DEGREE  OF  DOCTOR  OF  PHILOSOPHY. 


*  •  •  .' 


PRESS   OP 

THE    HERALD     PUBLISHING    CO. 

NORRISTOWN,    PA. 

1910 


Tlie  aim  of  this  writing  is  to  set  forth  the  statistics,  the 
number  and  proportionate  distribution  of  the  occurrences  of 
the  perfect  tense  in  the  Attic  Orators. 

Much  has  been  said  for  and  against  the  use  and  abuse 
of  the  statistical  method  of  discussing  syntactical  questions. 
Mere  enumeration  is.  of  course,  not  everything;  not  every- 
thing is  worth  counting,  nor  is  the  work  really  finished  when 
the  count  has  been  made.  Unless  there  is  some  principle 
of  usage  involved  which  the  count  may  demonstrate  or  at 
least  illustrate,  some  tendency  of  the  language  which  has 
been  gathered  or  divined  in  a  more  or  less  general  or  per- 
haps vague  way  in  advance,  the  counting  is  mere  numerical 
waste  of  time,  being  totally  without  objective  aim,  and  unless 
the  count  be  followed  up  by  careful  discussion  or  explanation, 
no  proper  end  has  been  attained.  Yet,  all  will  admit,  I  feel 
sure,  that  if  the  first  of  these  requisites  be  fulfilled,  even 
though  for  the  time  the  last  be  omitted,  at  least  this  much 
has  been  obtained  ;  a  basis  of  precise  fact  has  been  presented 
and  recorded  upon  which  it  will  be  possible  in  confidence  to 
build  up  a  scientific  conclusion. 

It  was  with  this  idea  in  mind  that  the  investigation  which 
has  resulted  in  this  paper  was  undertaken.  In  the  course  of 
his  reading,  the  writer  was  impressed  by  what  seemed  the 
frequency  of  the  perfect  tense  in  the  orations,  both  those  that 
are  acknowledged  as  genuine  and  those  that  are  regarded  as 
spurious,  of  Demosthenes.  Curiosity  was  aroused.  Was 
the  impression  misleading  or  would  a  careful  examination 
into  the  facts  confirm  it?  Was  there  anything  unique  in  this 
respect  in  Demosthenes,  or  was  his  practice  in  this 
point  of  a  piece  with  that  of  the  other  orators,  so  largely  his 
contemporaries  ?  There  was  this  further  consideration  that 
came  to  add  piquancy  to  the  question.  What  we  desire 
finally  in  our  study  of  the  Greeks,  is  to  get  at,  or  as  near  as 
may  be  to  approach  the  Greek  mind  in  its  simplicity  and  puri- 


228151 


tv.  to  strip  off  as  far  as  may  be  done  the  ouler  clothing  of  ar- 
tificiality and  convention  and  to  lay  it  bare  in  its  natural,  un- 
adorned and  uncovered  working.  If  we  could  discover  the 
people  in  their  manners  as  they  talked  in  their  unhampered 
intercourse  in  the  shop,  in  the  street,  in  the  social  g-atherings, 
then  we  should  have  a  reliable  index  of  the  untutored  Greek 
mind  and  thought.  Unfortunately,  this  in  its  completeness 
is  denied  us.  We  have  only  the  literary,  which  is  as  much 
as  to  say  the  conventional  language,  to  go  upon  ;  and  it  must 
always  be  a  matter  more  or  less  of  conjecture  what  elements 
in  this  represent  the  basis  of  expression  and  thought  on 
which  the  literary  structure  has  been  raised.  The  recent 
and  important  discovery  of  papyri  with  their  colloquial  Greek 
has  shown  in  a  striking  manner  how  much  the  popular  lan- 
guage may  have  varied  from  the  received  literary  tongue ;  or 
tihe  flood  of  light  that  has  been  thereby  thrown  on  the  lan- 
guage of  the  New  Testament  and  its  relation  linguistically 
to  the  spoken  rather  than  to  the  written  Greek  of  that  day,  is 
a  valuable  indication  of  the  light  we  might  get  from  similar 
courses  were  they  available  for  the  earlier  periods.  Unfor- 
tunately, no  such  are  at  our  service.  Under  such  conditions, 
the  best  we  can  do  is  to  have  recourse  to  those  works  of  the 
literary  inheritance  which  from  their  subject  matter,  occa- 
sion, method  of  composition  and  publication  may  be  pre- 
sumed most  likely  to  partake  of  popular  features.  To  this 
sphere  belong  unquestionably  along  with  Greek  comedy, 
what  of  it  remains  to  us,  the.  works  of  the  Attic  Orators. 
However  finished  they  may  be  in  form,  yet  they  were  ad- 
dressed to  a  popular  audience ;  whether  written  for  delivery 
in  the  popular  assembly  or  before  a  jury  drawn  from  the  peo- 
ple in  the  law  courts,  the  subjects  were  in  all  cases  drawn 
from  matters  of  interest  to  the  public  at  large  and  the  style  of 
presentation,  and  in  particular  the  language  had  of  necessity 
to  be  adapted  to  the  comprehension  of  the  audience  addressed. 
They  had  to  be  understood  by  the  people  or  the  speeches 
would  have  been  condemned  in  advance  and  would  have  fail- 
ed, while  literary  forms  and  rhetorical  convention  are  not  and 
cduld  not  therefore  be  banished,  yet  they  had  to  be  adapted 


5 

to  the  minds  and  modes  of  thought  of  the  people.  It  is 
fair,  consequently,  to  believe  that  in  the  phenomena  syntacti- 
cal and  other,  we  find  in  the  orators,  we  have  direct  indica- 
tions, if  no  more  than  indications,  of  popular  usage. 

It  had  been  hoped  and  proposed  to  do  something  to- 
wards fulfilling  the  second  of  the  two  requirements  referred 
to.  But,  unfortunately,  lack  of  time  and  pressure  of  other 
work  that  could  not  be  neglected,  precluded  this.  It  was 
therefore  deemed  advisable  to  publish  these  statistics,  in  the 
hope  that  they  might  be  found  useful  as  the  statement  of 
facts,  as  accurate  as  repeated  and  careful  recounting  could 
mako  them,  and  might  be  available  for  somebody  else  should 
circumstances  prove  propitious,  to  build  upon  in  further 
discussions. 

The  perfect  tense  differs  in  certam  important  respects 
from  the  other  tenses  that  have  to  do  with  the  past. 
The  imperfect  deals  with  the  past  as  such  but  in  doing 
so  reviews  the  past  as  it  was  by  presenting  it  pictorially 
or  visually,  as  it  has  been  said,  to  the  mind ;  in  it  the 
action  passes  in  review  before  the  mental  eye  of  the 
reader  who  becomes  in  a  sense  a  spectator  of  the  pro- 
cess and  manner  of  the  occurrence.  The  process  may  be- 
gin at  any  point  and  may  stop  at  any  point  short  of 
actual  completion.  Tlie  aorist  merely  notes  the  past  occur- 
rences as  a  fact.  Process  has  nothing  to  do  here ;  the  imag- 
ination is  not  called  into  play.  The  act  is  a  mere  abstrac- 
tion, as  it  were,  in  a  list ;  it  has  all  the  definiteness  of  a  tabu- 
lar statement.  The  perfect,  on  the  other  hand,  while  it  ex- 
presses a  past  occurrence,  at  tlie  same  time  relates  that  oc- 
currence to  the  present.  The  character  of  this  relation  may 
vary  within  wide  limits.  The  precise  form  it  takes  may  dif- 
fer in  different  languages,  though  the  fundamental  fact  of 
the  relation  remains  the  same.  It  may  simply,  as  is  mostly 
the  case  in  English,  place  the  action  in  a  period  of  time  which 
has  not  yet  entirely  elapsed  ;  in  other  words  it  may,  when  an 
attempt  is  made  to  localize  the  action  in  time,  do  so  by  specify- 
ing a  period  that  includes  the  present  moment,  however 
much  of  the  past  time  already  elapsed  may  be  included.     In 


6 

this  case,  the  period  is  virtually  treated  as  present.  Or  it 
may  indicate  with  or  without  specification  of  time,  that  the 
action  reaches  over  and  includes,  if  only  by  virtue  of  a  result- 
ant condition  or  effect,  the  present  moment.  This  is  most- 
ly the  case  in  Greek.  Hence  we  get  the  perfect  expressing 
a  resultant  or  even  an  abiding  condition  :  e.  g.  yiypar.rai  so 
common  in  the  New  Testament,  in  the  sense  "it  stands  writ- 
ten," carrying  with  it  the  action  of  permanence  and  perpetui- 
ty and  consequent  authority.  A  particularly  striking  in- 
stance of  this  is  found  in  the  perfect  imperative  passive : 
elprjirdiu  "let  stand  as  said  once  for  all,"  "enough,"  "don't  ask 
about  the  matter  again"  and  in  the  words  of  Pilate  yixpafpad 
yifpafa  "the  inscription  is  unalterable."  Particularly  notice- 
able, as  different  from  English  usage,  are  the  instances  in 
Greek  when  the  act  is  dated  by  means  of  a  definitely  past 
particle,  while  the  tense  conveys  the  notion  tihat  the  dating 
temporal  expression  hints  at  the  action  only  in  the  direction 
of  the  past,  but  has  no  such  influence  on  the  verbal  force  as 
relating  to  the  present. 

The  perfects  like  <'T5a,  K^Krr//ia(,  etc.,  which  have  become 
in  meaning  real  presents  are  emphatic  proofs  of  this  connec- 
tion of  this  tense  with  the  present  time. 

In  the  collating  of  the  perfect  forms  the  Teubner  text 
has  been  used.  One  page  contains  thirty-two  linei.  ^\11 
orations  considered  as  spurious  are  bracketed  thus  ().  All 
verb  forms  where  emendations  have  been  made  changing  the 
form  from  some  other  tense  to  a  perfect  are  marked  thus*. 

Many  thanks  are  here  expressed  to  the  numerous 
friends  who  have  aided  in  this  work  by  their  encouragement ; 
and  special  thanks  are  due  the  late  Dr.  William  A.  Lamber- 
ton.  Professor  of  Greek,  University  of  Pennsylvania,  for  his 
many  helpful  suggestions  and  criticisms ;  and  Dr.  William  N. 
Bates,  Professor  of  Greek,  University  of  Pennsylvania,  fc.r 
reading  the  proof. 

The  Author. 


7 
PERIPPIRASTICS. 

The  Greek  language  has  ample  facilities  for  periphrases 
and  periphrastic  forms.  With  its  many  participles  and  nu- 
merous auxiliaries,  it  is  a  wonder  that  we  do  not  find  more 
variations  than  actually  do  occur. 

The  perfect  participle  partaking  of  the  force  of  the  per- 
fect tense  naturally  lends  itself  more  easily  than  others  to  the 
periphrastic  use.  As  the  tense  so  often  points  to  the  resultant 
state,  the  participle  inclines  to  the  denotation  and  not  merely 
the  connotation,  of  tliat  state.  This  being  the  case  it  is  not 
surprising  that  whether  in  the  active  or  the  passive  voice  it 
should  so  often  become  little  more  than  an  adjective.  And, 
as  a  matter  of  fact,  it  is  just  through  its  parallelism  with  the 
adjective,  as  Alexander  has  sihown,  that  this  periphrastic 
usage  creeps  in.  Other  participles  are  slower  in  taking  this 
step ;  slowest  of  all  is  the  aorist,  in  which  the  verbal  force 
longest  and  most  eflfectively  resists  this  use  as  a  mere  adjec- 
tive. 

PERFECT  INDICATIVE. 

The  perfect  middle  and  passive  of  verbs  whose  stems  end 
in  a  consonant,  are  formed  by  the  third  person  plural  of  the 
present  tense  of  the  verb  "to  be"  and  the  perfect  participle  of 
the  verb  being  conjugated.  There  is  no  difference  in  the 
meaning  of  this  form  and  the  regular  perfect  form. 
Lysias.     7-5-6,  12-22-3,  13-92-8,     *i6-6-4,     16-19-6,     19-10-4, 

20-15-2,  22-10-5,  22-20-5,  25-6-4,  25-11-7,  30-31-3. 
Isaeus.     3-12-2,  3-12-3,  3-60-1,  3-66-8,  3-79-3,  5-5-3.  6-57-2. 
Hyperides.     6-43-3. 
Dinarchus.     1-89-7,1-96-2,2-12-11. 
Aeschines.     1-34-8,  3-38-9.  3-136-5- 

Isocrates.     5-49-1,6-65-6,8-112-1,  12-209-3,  12-263-10,  i6-i-6. 

Demosthenes.     1-22-4,  2-11-5,     3-29-8,     19-261-7,     20-117-2, 

21-169-7,     22-39-2,      23-200-12,      23-209-9,      24-210-2, 

35-26-9,    35-45-9»    43-68-6,    44-31-5.    53-3-4.    55-8-4- 

57-58-6,  57-66-2,  58-34-11,  58-48-5,  59-88-9.  59-89-4. 


8 

PERFECT  SUBJUNCTIVE. 

The  subjunctive  being  the  mode  of  anticipation  is  found 

a  number  of  times  in  its  perfect  form  in  the  orators.     All  the 

forms  here  noted  are  periphrastic,  no  form  analogous  to  the 

present  has  been  noted. 

Lysias.     4-10-6. 

Isaeus.     *ii-i2-9. 

Lycurgus.     *i-i07-3,  i-i  16-10. 

Aesdhines.     3-58-4,  3-64-7.  ' 

Isocrates.     5-1 1-3,  5-18-2. 

Demosthenes.  1-8-10,  4-51-2,  8-64-8,  10-66-5,  ^3-^5-3' 
14-19-3,  15-8-8,  18-178-10,  18-178-14,  18-228-1,  19-2-2, 
19-16-5,  19-185-5,  19-186-1,  19-224-3,  21-9-6,  21-9-6, 
23-94-6,  23-121-10,  23-122-3,  23-143-5,  25-71-6,  25-99-8, 
31-14-1,  35-54-7.  39-18-5,  41-11-13.  44-64-6,  58-21-7. 

PERFECT  OPTATIVE. 

The  optative  like  the  subjunctive  has  been  used  frequent- 
ly and  in  all  cases  but  one  (Lysias  23-3-6)  is  periphrastic    in 

form. 

Andocides.     1-39-7,  1-41-7,  1-63-2. 

Lysias.  *i-i-3,  1-2-2,  1-18-4,  9-4-5,  9-1 1-6,  12-15-5,  12-82-7, 
18-10-7,  18-10-8,  24-23-3,  *29-i2-3,  31-4-3- 

Isaeus.     1-36-7,  6-41-7,  6-42-1,  7-27-2,  8-22-7,  8-23-8. 

Hyperides.     5-4-4. 

Lycurgus.     1-19-9. 

Aeschines.     2-42-6,  2-155-5. 

Isocrates.     12-74-2,  12-130-6,  14-6-3,  17-11-4,  17-1^-5,  21-3-7. 

Demosthenes.  6-28-3,  18-22-4,  19-71-2,  19-134-9,  19-169-4, 
20-82-1,  22-28-3,  23-86-14,  23-86-16,  24-59-12,  24-107-3, 
29-23-2,  30-10-9,  33-18-5.  34-1 1-6,  34-49-3-  35-31-5, 
35-36-5.  35-36-7,  39-15-7,  42-6-6,  47-34-9,  47-35-2, 
47-38-6,  47-57-4,  48-19-3,  48-44-3,  52-8-4,  52-8-5, 
52-19-3,  52-19-4,  53-6-8,  53-7-to,  53-18-7,  57-44-2, 
58-30-7,  59-69-9. 


9 

FUTURE  PERFECT. 

As  there  is  no  form  iov  th«'  future  perfect  active  in  almost 
all  Greek  verbs,  it  was  necessary  to  resort  to  a  periphrastic 
form  to  express  the  future  perfect  tense  active,  as  well  as  the 
middle  and  passive.  So  we  find  the  perfect  ])articiple  jcjined 
with  the  future  tense  of  the  verb  "to  be,"  used  to  express  the 
future  perfect  tense. 
Antifjihon.  1-8-5,  5"^0"4- 
Andocides.     1-72-5,  1-129-4. 

Lysias.     *5-4-4,  *  12- 100-4,  1 3-97-4-  '''22-19-8,  27-8-1,  30-23-9. 
Dinarchus.     2-21-7. 

Isocrates.     6-10-6,   11-27-6,  15-125-5,   15-297-5,   15-297-6. 
Demosthenes.  1-14-7,  3-6-6,  4-50-7,  4-50-8,  19-336-9,  20-17-6, 
20-166-4,  21-50-6,  22-39-6,  35-56-6.  39-14-6.     39-15-.S, 
45-88-8,  52-24-5.  52-33-3.  58-31-2,  59-86-13. 

PLUPERFECT  TENSE. 

The  third  person  plural  of  the  pluperfect  tense  of  verb.s 
ending  in  a  consonant  is  formed  from  the  perfect  participle 
and  the  third  person  plural  of  the  imperfect  tense  of  the  verb 
"to  be." 

Antiphon.     6-34-6. 
Andocides.     1-45-12. 

Lysias.     *i2-53-2,  14-10-5,  25-10-6.  27-12-5,  32-18-5. 
Isaeus.     2-28-4. 
Aeschines.     3-154-8,  3-154-9- 
Isocrates.     6-18-3,  7-26-2,  11-8-9,  12- 194-5,  12-233-9,  17-34-3., 

17-34-4,  18-1-1. 
Demosthenes.     1-7-6,  4-42-7,     18-201-5,     21-80-9,     21-193-5, 
46-15-5,  48-32-4,  57-^5-4.  59-48-1. 


lO 


ANTIPHON. 


i 


TITLE 


3    1 

<S  V 


V    (8 

0.0. 


O,^ 


tJ  S  I  tj  -a    y  2 
C  .5,1  «J  10  I  u  S 

'^  -^  l"^    Q.l'^    o- 

0,c^  0.O  0,JS 


w2.> 
O,^ 


E  5J 


o    m 
(-0. 


<S. 


Necio  Veneficio  Patratse 
Tetralogia  I a 

(3 
7 

Tetralogia  II     .        .    .  « 

7 

Tetralogia  III  .  .  .  -a 
/3 
7 
6 

De  Herodis  Nece    .    .    . 

De  Choreuta 

Totals 

De  Mysteriis 

De  Reditu  suo    .... 
De  Pace  ... 

[Contra  Alcibiadem]  .    . 

Totals 


3 

2y. 

3 

2X 

IX 

2 

IX 
23[f 

I3X 
69A 

lO 

I 

2 

5 

2 

4 
4 
3 

2 

5 

2 

4 

31 

9 

84 

20 
5 
3 
2 

8 
I 
2 
3 

2 
I 

45 
10 

102 

12 

I 

13 

^ 

I 
I 

I 

I 

2 

31 
6 

5 
2 

5 

2 

12 

5 

5 

5 

5 

4 

5 

89 

21 

202 

4.70 
2.87 

1.66 

87 
2.00 
4.00 

4-3° 
1.66 
2.20 
4.00 
2.50 
2.28 
2.00 
370 
1.58 

2.90 


ANDOCIDES. 


.38-/8 

48 

.S5 

10 

.  . 

3 

I 

2 

119 

8 

7 

9 

2 

.  . 

.  . 

18 

"X 

8 

13 

4 

.  . 

.  . 

25 

15^2 

24 

19 

b 

•  • 

•  • 

49 

nVi 

87 

96 

22 

.  . 

.  . 

3 

I 

2 

211 

3- 70 
2.25 
2.12 
316 

2.87 


II 

LYSIAS. 


TITLE 


lOu  ^  jOu  a,  |Q,  ^  |Q,  CO  |0u  O  lOu  -=  lO-  H  lU,  Ou  |H  a.  I 


1  Pro  Cade  Eratosthenis 

2  [Funebri  Oratio] 
In  Simonem  .    . 
Ue  Vulnere  Exindustria 

Illato 

[Pro  Callire   Sacrilegio] 
^Contra  Andocidem  Im- 
pietatis]      .        ... 
De  Sacrse  Olivse  Triinco 
[Ad  Familiares  Obtrec- 

tarcs]  .        .    . 
[Pro  Milite]  .    . 

.\dversus  Theomnestus  I 
[AdTersus  Theomnes- 
tus II]  . 
Adversus  Eratosthenem 
.Adversus  Agoratum  . 
.-vdversus  Alcibiadem  I 
[Adversus      Alcibiadem 

II] 

Pro  Mantitheo 
De    Publicis    Pecuniis  . 
Pro  Bonis  Fratis  Niciae 
Pro  Bonis  Aristophanis. 
[Pro    Polystrato] 
Munerum     Acceptorum 

Apologia        .    .    . 
Contra  Mercatores  Fru- 

mentaria    . 
.Adversus  Pancleonem  . 
Pro  Impotente  .    . 

De  Affectata  Tyrannide 
Contra  Evandiuni .  .  . 
Contra  Fpicrateni  .  ,  . 
Contra  Frgoclem  .  .  . 
Contra  Philocratem  .  . 
Contra  Nicomachum  . 
.Adversus  Philonem  .  . 
Contra  L>iogitonem    .    . 

Olympiaca 

De  Republica    .... 

Totals  .    . 


8^ 

8 

21 

I7X 

34 

5 

9 

16 

»7 

4% 

6 

7 

^% 

I 

6 

loy^ 

12 

26 

^>i 

12 

19 

4% 

5 

3 

^H 

.3 

II 

sV^ 

I6 

17 

2% 

II 

2 

20% 

25 

42 

19H 

II 

I6 

lO/g 

20 

30 

2^ 

.3 

.S 

4H 

9 

17 

^% 

6 

4 

5H 

9 

21 

1234 

20 

29 

VA 

12 

8 

sVi 

9 

13 

aH 

9 

3 

VA 

3 

s% 

7 

II 

8>/, 

12 

43 

5H 

i8 

10 

?,% 

3 

3 

?,y% 

4 

II 

^-H 

5 

5 

m 

I? 

14 

r/% 

5 

7 

VA 

lO 

25 

iji 

2 

8 

2H 

I 

6 

228 

341 

468 

4 
31 

I 

5 
18 

7 

It 

1 
3 


6 
I 
4 
5 
I 

3 
I 

4 
I 
I 

119' 


42 
34 

9 
21 

51 

20 
75 
36 
54 

9 
26 
10 
34 
55 
22 

27 

17 
3 

19 
62 
29 
12 
20 
12 
35 
14 
40 
II 
8 


436 
2.78 
4.22 

363 
6.40 

4.00 
4.12 

2.11 
5.60 
8.87 

9.40 
372 
182 

5-33 

3.60 
5-47 
4-44 
5-91 
4-3' 
293 

5.00 

378 

•92 

332 

7.29 

539 
3^3 
5.92 

436 

4.51 
I  96 
5.60 
586 
336 


952I417 


12 


ISAEUS. 


V 

3 

z 

TITLE 

5! 

Perfect 
Participle 
Perfect 
Infinitive 

Perfect 
Subjunctive 
Terf^t 
Optative 

Perfect 
Imperative 

Pluperfect 
Tense 

y 

u 

Ha, 

11 

I 

2 

3 
4 
5 
6 

7 
8 

9 
lo 
II 

12 

De  Cleonymi  hered  .    . 
De  Meneclis  hered   .    . 
De  Pyrrhi  hered  .    .    . 
De  Nicostrati  hered  .    . 
De  Dicaeogenis  hered   . 
De  Philoctemonis  hered 
De  .'\pollodori  hered    . 
De  Cironis  hered       .    . 
De  Astyphili  hered 
De  Aristarchi  hered  .    . 
De  Hagnife  hered    .    . 
Pro  Euphileto    .... 

Totals 

II 

1034: 

I7M 
7X 

1014: 

9% 
7 
14 

2>y% 

6 
6 

32 
9 

26 

33 
31 
20 

6 
12 
20 

5 

12 
12 

32 

13 

18 

19 
30 
23 
10 
6 

23 
2 

I 

4 
3 
8 

4 

I 

9 
3 
4 
I 
2 

I 

2 

I 
2 

I 

I 

•  • 

20 
19 

68 
25 
52 
58 
63 
54 
19 
22 

45 
9 

454 

I.81 
1.76 
3.26 

3-51 
4.11 
3-93 
5.90 
432 
2.00 

314 

3.21 
2.66 

131 

206 

200 

40 

6 

I 

I 

3-46 

ISOCRATES. 


E 
s 
Z 

TITLE 

1 

CL, 

„  a. 
OuQ, 

1=1 

■B 
u 

CUC/^ 

V 

Id 

it 

Is 

CLh* 

1. 

J 

I 

2 
3 
4 
5 
6 

7 
8 

9 
10 
II 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 

17 
18 

19 
20 
21 

[Ad  Demon! 
Ad  Nicoclem 
Nicocles 
Panegyricus 
Philippus    . 
Archidamus 
Areopagitica 
De   Pace 
Evagoras    . 
Helena;  Encc 
Busiris    . 
Panathenaicu 
Contra  Sophi 
Plalaicus 
De  Permutat 
De  Bigis    . 
Trapeziticus 
Contra  Callir 
^ginetica  . 
Contra  Lochi 
Contra  Euthy 

CUI 

)m 

s 
sta 

on 

na 

ter 
m 

ion 

s  . 
e 

:huni 

n  . 
11m 

12 

I2X 

15;^ 

45  >^ 
36^ 
26/8 
193^ 
33  X 
19 

isy^ 

67 

sH 

12 

14X 
15 

I2«^ 

AVz 

9 
10 
12 
68 

49 
29 
21 

48 
16 
II 
16 
45 

9 

25 

248 

II 

9 
27 
10 

5 
3 

681 

8 
21 

27 

77 

100 

64 

53 
62 

45 

34 

36 

260 

7 

34 

100 

32 
27 
65 

9 
6 

1 100 

2 

I 

2 

19 

19 

10 

2 

4 

3 

6 

4 
24 

2 
22 

I 
10 

8 

4 

I 
144 

2 

2 

*    ■ 

2 

I 

2 

I 

6 

2 

■  • 
2 

I 
I 

I 

2 

2 

I 

8 

I 

I 
3 

5 

19 

32 

41 

166 

170 

105 

77 

114 

64 

51 

57 

334 

16 

62 

373 

44 

50 

lOI 

47 
14 
11 

1948 

1.58 
2.61 
2.64 
363 
4.69 
4.01 
4.02 
3-42 
336 
329 
4-95 
4.98 
2.78 
4.16 
5.00 
3.66 
3-51 
6.73 
3.87 
311 
2.44 

Totals 

470>^ 

414 

13 


LYCURGUS. 


z 

TITLE 

Qu 

V 

1 

V 

^  a. 
0,0- 

1 

Perfect 
Subjunctive 
Perfect 
Optative 

.>l 

J 

1 

3 

0. 

Future 
Perfect 

Total 
Perfects 

a"  a' 

I 

Contra  Leocratem     .    . 
Totals 

37% 

'    6: 

51     7 

3  i^ 
3  14 

\           2 
^           2 

1 
] 

1 

■  ■  1 '  ■ 

156  4«3 

37% 

'    63    7 

1  •    • 

156  4- 13 

AESCHINES. 


I 

2 

3 

In  Timarchum  .... 
De  Falsa  Legatione  .    . 
Contra  Ctesiphontem    . 

52j< 

7S'A 

88 

71 
126 

118 

99 

138 

32 

23 
27 

2 

2 

2 

238 

195 
295 

4-55 
3.68 

390 

Totals     .... 

178 

285 

355 

82 

2 

2 

2 

728 

4.09 

HYPERIDES. 


I 

2 

3 
4 
5 
6 

Contra  Demosthenem  . 

( Fragmentary. ) 
Pro  Lycophonem  .    .    . 

(Fragmentary.) 
Pro  Euxenippo  .... 
Contra  Philippum  .    .    . 
Contra  Athenogenem  . 
Funebris  Oratio    .    .    . 

Totals                 .    . 

rA 

9% 
9 

32A 

16 
6 
9 

17 

48 

II 

4 
17 
28 

60 

7 
2 

5 
8 

22 

I 
I 

•   • 

' 

35 

25 

34 
12 

32 
53 

»3i 

3.12 
383 
3.22 
5.88 

4.01 

DINARCHUS. 


I 

2 

3 

In    Demosthenem    .    . 
In  Aristoijitonem.     .    , 
Contra   Philoclera    .    . 

32/8 
7A 

80 

28 

9 

143 
28 
46 

217 

22 
26 

-    • 

I 
I 

245 
57 
59 

36. 

7-53 

7.60 

10.20 

45  H 

117 

7.91 

14 


DEMOSTHENES. 


llOlynthiaca  I    . 

2  Olynthiacall  . 

3  niynthiaca  III 

4  In  Philippum  I 

5  De  Pace  .    .    . 

6  In  Philippum  II 
7J[Ue  Haloneso] 
8  [)e  Chersoneso 


In  Philippum  III 
[In  Philippum  IlII] 
[Ad  Philippi  Epistolam] 
l2J[Epistola    Philippi] 

13  [Ue    Republica    Ord 

nanda]      .... 

14  De  Classibus    .    . 

15  De    Rhodionum  Liber 

tale 

16  De  Megalopolitis 

17  [De    Pnedere    Alexan 

dreoj 

18  De  Corona 

19  De  Falsa  Legatione 

20  Adversus  Leptinem 

21  Adversus  Midiam    . 

22  Adversus  Androtionem 

23  Adversus  Aristocratem 

24  Adversus  Timocratem. 

25  Adversus       Aristogito- 

nem  I  .    .        ... 

26  [Adversus     Aristogito- 

nem    II] 

27  Ih  Aphobum  I     .    .    . 

28  In  Aphobum  II       .    . 

29  In  Aphobum  III    ,    . 

30  In  Onelorem  I     .    .    . 

31  In  Onetorem  II   .    .    . 

32  Adversus     Zenothemi- 

dem 

33  [Adversus  Apaturium] 

34  [Adversus       Pbormio- 

nemj    .    .  .    . 

35  ^Adversus  Lakritum]  . 

36  Pro  Phormione 

37  Adversus    Pantaenetum 

38  Adversus        Nausima- 

chum 

39  Adversus  BcEotum  .    . 

40  [Adversus  Boeotum  II] 


7X 
8 

12X 
6 

7^ 

9H 

17 

SKI 

9ys\ 

I'A 

7X 
89  K 

58/2 
52 

26 

6^ 

15^ 

VA 

VA 
10 

13 

II 

hA 

7X 

loA 
i5'4 


10 

12 

3 

17 

22 

5 

24 
25 

12 

16 

2 

5 

9 

10 

4 

15 

10 

3 

20 

18 

15 

16 

14 
12 

38 
28 

16 
29 

8 
II 

12 
8 

4 
6 

3 
I 

17 

7 

6 

5 

«5 

4 

17 

18 

4 

2 

II 

3 

13 
114 

28 
165 

3 
40 

225 

68 

254 
72 

75 
38 

135 
5^ 

137 

58 

39 
16 

153 
123 

143 
129 

24 
48 

S3 

54 

9 

II 

42 

20 

46 

21 

10 

16 
21 

15 
24 

39 
37 

21 
12 
16 


28 
44 
39 
50 
23 
29 

49 
47 
6- 
69 
19 
15 

31 

25 

40 
16 

44 
324 
565 
182 

314 
132 
326 
303 

118 


_86 
5-5° 
4-38 
392 
383 
3-68 
5.02 
2.84 
370 
3-94 
3-45 
2-55 

3-39 
2.46 

450 
2.13 

6.06 
4.29 
6.31 
4.16 

5-55 
6.14 

5-57 
5.82 

4-53 


30  4-44 

logj  5.89 

391  6.35 

78  4.95 


463 
7.42 

5.86 
4.58 


56  4-30 

i;   541469 

•  I  86  5.54 
88  6.07 


39 
31 
49 


5-37 
2.95 
3-21 


15 


DEMOSTHENES  (Continued.) 


i 

z 

TITLE 

Pages 

Perfect 
Indicative 
Perfect 
Participle 

1-% 

Perfect 

Subjunctive 

Perfect 

Optative 

Perfect        ' 

Imperative 

Pluperfect 

Indicative 

a.  IS 

a 

,0    V 

41 
42 

43 

44 
45 
46 

47 

48 
49 
50 
51 
52 
53 
54 
55 
56 
57 
5« 
59 
60 

Contra  Spudiara  .    .    . 
[AdversusPhcenippuml 
[Adversus  Macartatum] 
[Adversus  Leocharem] 
In^Stephanum  I  .    .    . 

In  Stephanum  II]     . 

In  Euergem  at  Mnes- 

ibulum] 

[In  Olympiodorum]  • 
[Adversus  Timotheum  ] 
[Adversus  Polyclem]   • 
De  Corona  Trierarchiae 
[Contra  Callipum]  .    . 
[AdversusNicostratum] 
Adversus  Cononem     . 
Contra  Calliclem     .    . 
[Contra  Dionysodorum] 
Contra  Eubulidem  .    . 

Contra  Theocrinem]  . 

In  Nejeram]       .    .    . 
[Declaraatio  Funebris] 

Totals 

8 

8K 
»7 

23X 

I7>8 

I8X 

5>i 

8^ 

8 
12/2 

^Vz 
»3 

18^ 

18 

20 

39 
69 

15 

28 

13 
20 
II 
12 

12 
II 

25 
25 
36 
38 
28 

37 
18 

16 

38 
25 
53 
70 

17 

29 
II 

18 

33 
20 
10 
9 
25 
21 

30 
36 
49 
69 

31 

3 
2 
I 

II 
18 
I 

8 
6 

3 
I 
8 
2 

3 

12 

2 

7 

9 

13 

14 

II 

1 
I 

I 

I 

4 
2 

4 
3 

I 

It 
I 

* 

I 
I 

I 
I 

I 

2 

I 

23 

59 

46 

104 

158 

34 

69 

33 
4» 
45 
40 

30 
26 
62 
48 
73 
85 
93 
123 
60 

2.87 
6.94 
2.48 
6.1 1 

7-43 
5-44 

2.96 
2.27 

2.33 
2.46 
7.11 
3-53 
325 
4.96 

5-64 
5.61 

4-59 
4.96 

372 

5-85 

1043^ 

2020 

2220 

632 

29 

37 

3 

9 

17 

4967 

4-75 

U    C    BERKELEY  LIBRARIES 


Hfi^lbHDS 


